🔗 Share this article

Australia's bold action to ban social platforms access for those under 16 is creating waves worldwide. Politicians, campaigners, and families are observing intently to see if this approach will become a template for countries abroad.

Across Europe Momentum

Throughout Europe, a increasing number of states are moving toward comparable restrictions.

• Denmark has stated a prohibition on social media for children under fifteen, with the leader arguing that smartphones and networks are "stealing our kids' innocence". The policy could be enacted in the coming year.
• Norway is planning to implement a access barrier of 15, pointing to the need to protect children from the "power of the AI".
• Ireland is introducing a online verification tool to verify the identity and age of social media participants. Officials have stated that an Australia-style ban is "an options on the table".
• In Spain, the prime minister has urged lawmakers to pass a law raising the legal age for accessing social media to 16.
• In France, the president has floated the idea of a ban for those under fifteen, and a parliamentary commission has endorsed a similar step, alongside an overnight "digital curfew" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The government in The Dutch government has recommended parents to prevent their kids from social media before 15.

Across the European Union, the European parliament has passed a symbolic motion demanding a ban for under-16s without guardian approval is provided. Even though it cautions of the "compulsive" quality of these apps, the resolution does not establish binding law.

"An effective age restriction is a good foundation," stated one parliamentarian driving the initiative.

Britain: A Watchful Approach

For the United Kingdom, the leadership has kept open a future ban, stating that "nothing is off the table" but insisting any decision must be "grounded in conclusive data".

Earlier, interest grew behind a legislative effort to impose controls on social media use by minors, but it was in the end modified. Instead, the administration committed to further research the matter.

Advocacy groups have voiced concerns. One foundation set up by the family of a teenager who took her own life after being exposed to harmful online content suggests that a strict age ban could fail to improve online safety and could result in a "sudden drop-off" of risk when users turn 16.

"Australia's ban is a response to the failure of the tech sector to build platforms and apps that are appropriate and age appropriate for minors," stated a prominent peer.

America: A Fragmented Picture

Across America, action is largely happening at the state level due to national gridlock.

• Utah requires parental consent for under-18s to use social media and controls overnight use.
• The state of Florida has passed a law prohibiting under-14s from creating accounts on social media, though it is subject to constitutional disputes.
• Virginia has approved a regulation limiting teenagers to 60 minutes of social media time per day, with additional access dependent on a guardian's okay.
• Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have similarly passed bills demanding parental consent for teenagers to create social media presences.

Even with widespread concern and proposals from some politicians to mimic the Australian path, a federal ban is presently seen as unlikely.

Global Outlook

Beyond Europe and the US, further countries are likewise considering moves.

• Malaysia intends to prohibit social media for teenagers starting from next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has increased the access age for one major platform to 16.

But, international organizations take a more nuanced tone. Unicef has advised that blanket prohibitions pose dangers and "might prove counterproductive". The agency notes that online platforms can be a "lifeline" for vulnerable youth and that bans should not be a "excuse" for platform operators to improve safety.

As this worldwide discussion unfolds, the actions of this nation and its followers indicate that states globally are increasingly willing to delay for tech companies to self-regulate.